OrionStar CleaniBot S55 Pro vs. KEENON KLEENBOT C55
OrionStar CleaniBot S55 Pro and KEENON KLEENBOT C55 are autonomous commercial cleaning robots targeting hotels, hospitals, malls and large indoor facilities. Based on ROBOT24.com market-research data records, this comparison examines their differences in cleaning performance, water capacity, runtime, navigation, perception and operational capabilities.

Introduction
OrionStar CleaniBot S55 Pro and KEENON KLEENBOT C55 are both represented in the ROBOT24.com market-research data records and are compared here using their recorded specifications and use cases.
OrionStar CleaniBot S55 Pro is recorded as an autonomous commercial cleaning AMR, with use cases including hotels, hospitals, offices, malls, schools and exhibition halls. KEENON KLEENBOT C55 is recorded as a heavy-duty autonomous commercial cleaning robot, with use cases including warehouses, malls, airports, factories, hospitals and logistics facilities.
The main documented differences are in their physical configuration, cleaning performance, water capacity, runtime, autonomy stack and the level of technical detail available in the ROBOT24.com market-research data records.
At a Glance
| Metric | OrionStar CleaniBot S55 Pro | KEENON KLEENBOT C55 |
|---|---|---|
| Robot type | Autonomous commercial cleaning AMR | Heavy-duty autonomous commercial cleaning robot |
| Use cases | Hotels; hospitals; offices; malls; schools; exhibition halls | Warehouses; malls; airports; factories; hospitals; logistics facilities |
| Dimensions | 650 x 580 x 550 mm | 860 x 850 x 1082 mm |
| Weight | 70 kg | 150 kg |
| Payload / capacity | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Cleaning functions | Sweeping; scrubbing; vacuuming; mopping; self-cleaning; disinfection | Sweeping; scrubbing; vacuuming; dust mopping; triple-roller cleaning |
| Cleaning efficiency | Up to 1,368 m2 /h; scrubbing 1,197 m2 /h | Up to 2,376 m2 /h |
| Water tanks | 22 L clean / 15 L waste | 60 L clean / 47 L dirty |
| Maximum speed | 1.2 m/s | ~1.2 m/s |
| Runtime | 3.5-28 hours mode dependent | Up to 5 hours; battery swap supported |
| Charging time | <4 hours | ~4 hours |
| Navigation | AI navigation; autonomous path planning; autonomous docking | LiDAR SLAM; 360 deg obstacle avoidance; autonomous docking |
| Sensors / perception | LiDAR; stereo camera; ultrasonic; line lasers; cliff detection | LiDAR; 4 stereo cameras; 3D vision; IMU; collision/cliff sensors |
| Special capability | Automatic cleaning-mode switching; cloud fleet management; digital reporting | Triple-roller cleaning; hot battery swap; optional water workstation |
| Availability | Commercially available | Commercially available |
| Price | Approx. US$15,999 | USD $22,000-26,000 |
How They Compare
In terms of role, OrionStar CleaniBot S55 Pro is recorded for Hotels; hospitals; offices; malls; schools; exhibition halls, while KEENON KLEENBOT C55 is recorded for Warehouses; malls; airports; factories; hospitals; logistics facilities. Their overlap is strongest where both records target the same operating environment, but the Robot24 entries also show different emphasis in their listed functions and deployment focus.
On the recorded performance figures, weight is listed as 70 kg for OrionStar CleaniBot S55 Pro and 150 kg for KEENON KLEENBOT C55; maximum speed is recorded as 1.2 m/s versus ~1.2 m/s; runtime is 3.5-28 hours mode dependent versus Up to 5 hours; battery swap supported.
For cleaning capability, OrionStar CleaniBot S55 Pro is recorded with Sweeping; scrubbing; vacuuming; mopping; self-cleaning; disinfection, while KEENON KLEENBOT C55 is recorded with Sweeping; scrubbing; vacuuming; dust mopping; triple-roller cleaning. Cleaning efficiency is listed as Up to 1,368 m2/h; scrubbing 1,197 m2/h and Up to 2,376 m2/h, respectively.
For autonomy and perception, OrionStar CleaniBot S55 Pro is recorded with AI navigation; autonomous path planning; autonomous docking and LiDAR; stereo camera; ultrasonic; line lasers; cliff detection. KEENON KLEENBOT C55 is recorded with LiDAR SLAM; 360 deg obstacle avoidance; autonomous docking and LiDAR; 4 stereo cameras; 3D vision; IMU; collision/cliff sensors.
Summary
Both OrionStar CleaniBot S55 Pro and KEENON KLEENBOT C55 occupy the same broad comparison category, but their Robot24 records differ across service or cleaning function, capacity, runtime, navigation and commercial deployment features. The figures above should be read as a direct comparison of the data currently stored in Robot24 rather than as a broader market assessment.
More articles on this topic
83 articles
ReportRichtech DUST-E S vs. Gausium Phantas
ReportEngineAI SE01 vs. AGIBOT RAISE A1
ReportRichtech DUST-E S vs. KEENON KLEENBOT C20
ReportRobint Rhino vs. OrionStar CleaniBot S55 Pro
ReportECOVACS DEEBOT X8 PRO OMNI vs. eufy X10 Pro Omni
ReportUnitree R1 EDU vs. Booster K1
ReportCleanfix S170 Navi vs. OrionStar CleaniBot K1
ReportCleanfix S170 Navi vs. Nexaro NR 1700
ReportReeman Nurse vs. Robotise JEEVES
ReportBear Robotics Servi Plus vs. OrionStar LuckiBot Pro
ReportBear Robotics Servi Plus vs. KEENON DINERBOT T10
ReportUBTECH Cruzr 1S vs. Hantewin S30BUSINESS NEWS WEEKLY LETTER
The Weekly Letter for Robotics Professionals, Summarizing the Most Important Industry Moves, Launches, Deals and Signals.