Comparisons · Robot24.com Original

LOVOT vs. PARO

LOVOT and PARO are companion robots designed for emotional interaction and support. We compare their use cases, mobility, runtime, sensing and interactive capabilities.

October 1, 2026 by Business Desk Team

LOVOT and PARO are compared here using the specifications and use cases recorded in the supplemental ROBOT24.com market-data comparison material.

LOVOT is recorded as autonomous home companion robot, with use cases including home companionship; emotional support; education; family interaction. PARO is recorded as therapeutic baby harp seal companion robot, with use cases including elder care; dementia support; therapy; hospitals and nursing homes.

The main documented differences are in their physical configuration, performance figures, autonomy approach, capacity, sensing, and the level of technical detail available for each model.

At a Glance

Metric	LOVOT	PARO
Robot type	Autonomous home companion robot	Therapeutic baby harp seal companion robot
Use cases	Home companionship; emotional support; education; family interaction	Elder care; dementia support; therapy; hospitals and nursing homes
Dimensions	Approx. 43 cm tall	Length approx. 57 cm; height approx. 16 cm
Weight	Approx. 4.3 kg	2.7 kg
Payload / capacity	Not applicable	Not applicable
Maximum speed	Slow indoor companion movement; exact public speed not consistently stated	Stationary / non-locomoting
Runtime	Approx. 45 minutes	Approx. 1.5 hours
Charging time	Approx. 15-30 minutes per normal cycle	Rechargeable NiMH battery; charging cradle/pacifier style charger
Navigation	Autonomous wheel drive; indoor movement; returns for charging	No autonomous navigation; autonomous interactive behaviour
Sensors	Camera, thermal camera, depth camera, microphones, touch, distance, obstacle, IMU and environmental sensors	Tactile, light, audio, temperature and posture sensors
Special capability	Recognises family members; responds to touch and mood; warm soft body	Learns user preferences; responds to stroking, voice, light and being held
Availability	Commercially available mainly Japan/selected markets	Commercially available
Price	JPY 399,800 reported for earlier version	Approx. USD $6,000 reported

How They Compare

In terms of role, LOVOT is recorded for Home companionship; emotional support; education; family interaction, while PARO is recorded for Elder care; dementia support; therapy; hospitals and nursing homes.

They overlap most where similar users/environments are targeted, but the records still show distinct differences in the deployment focus and interaction model.

Specific figures to be noted for the recorded performance figures: weight: Approx. 4.3 kg (LOVOT) 2.7 kg (PARO) maximum speed: Slow speed indoor companion movement; public speed not always given against Stationary / non-locomoting: runtime: Approx. 45 min. (LOVOT) vs. Approx. 1.5 hrs (PARO)

Available Capacity also varies in the records: LOVOT: Not applicable PARO: Not applicable.

LOVOT was recorded with Autonomous wheel drive; indoor movement; returns for charging and Camera, thermal camera, depth camera, microphones, touch, distance, obstacle, IMU and environment sensors. PARO was recorded with No autonomous navigation; autonomous interactive behaviour and Tactile, light, audio, temperature and posture sensors.

Summary

While both LOVOT and PARO fall under the same broad comparison category, the recorded specifications show comparative differences in operating role, mobility/mode of interaction, endurance, autonomy, sensing, and deployment model. The above figures should be used as a direct comparison against the Robot24 comparison data provided, not as a ranked Market assessment.

LOVOT vs. PARO

At a Glance

Summary

More articles on this topic

BUSINESS NEWS WEEKLY LETTER