Comparisons · Robot24.com Original

DEEPRobotics Lynx M20Pro vs. MagicBot MagicDog Y1

DEEPRobotics Lynx M20Pro and MagicBot MagicDog Y1 are industrial quadruped robots built for inspection, security and emergency response. We compare their payload, speed, endurance, mobility and autonomous navigation capabilities.

September 29, 2026 by Business Desk Team

deeprobotics-lynx-m20pro-vs-magicbot-magicdog-y1

Introduction

DEEPRobotics Lynx M20Pro and MagicBot MagicDog Y1 are industrial quadruped robots designed for demanding applications including inspection, security and emergency response. This comparison uses specifications and use cases recorded in the ROBOT24.com market-data records.

The Lynx M20Pro is a wheel-legged quadruped listed for industrial and utility inspection, mapping, patrol, security, emergency response and research. MagicDog Y1 is an industrial quadruped designed for industrial inspection, logistics, security, emergency response and research.

While their applications overlap, the two robots differ significantly in size, payload, speed, endurance, mobility and autonomous capabilities. The comparison below examines these differences using the data currently available in the ROBOT24.com market-data records.

At a Glance

Metric	DEEPRobotics Lynx M20Pro	MagicBot MagicDog Y1
Robot type	Wheel-legged quadruped	Industrial quadruped robot
Use cases	Industrial inspection; utility inspection; mapping; patrol; security; emergency response; research	Industrial inspection; logistics; security; emergency response; research
Dimensions	820 x 430 x 570 mm	915-1050 x 458 x 800-810 mm
Weight	33-35 kg	65-70 kg
Payload	15 kg effective; 50 kg maximum	45 kg dynamic; 150 kg maximum
Maximum speed	5 m/s max; 2 m/s operational	6 m/s
Runtime	3-5 hours no load; 2.5-3.5 hours with 15 kg	4-6 hours
Range / endurance	15-20 km no load; 12-15 km with 15 kg	>20 km reported
Navigation	Autonomous wheel-legged locomotion; point-cloud mapping; terrain recognition	Autonomous navigation; path planning; terrain adaptation; GPS-denied capability
Sensors	Dual 96-line LiDAR; dual wide-angle cameras; IMU	3D LiDAR; 2 depth cameras; 2 optical cameras; multi-sensor fusion
Protection rating	IP66	IP67
Special capability	25 cm continuous stair height; 80 cm single step; SDK	>=60 cm obstacle crossing; >=45 deg slope; optional 157 TOPS AI module
Availability	Commercially available	Commercially available
Price	USD $49,999-61,200	US$70,000-104,000

How They Compare

The two robots have significant variations in size and performance. Lynx M20Pro weighs 33-35 kg and attains a top speed of 5 m/sec and an operating speed of 2 m/sec. Magic Dog Y1 is much heavier at 65-70 kg but attains a slightly greater top speed of 6 m/sec. The runtime is given as 3-5 hours at no load for Lynx M20Pro, decreasing to 2.5-3.5 hours with a 15 kg load, versus 4-6 hours for Magic Dog Y1.

Payload is a third significant distinction. The ROBOT24.com market-data tables show Lynx M20Pro with a 15 kg effective payload and 50 kg maximum payload. Magic Dog Y1 is listed as having a 45 kg dynamic payload and a maximum load of 150 kg.

Both of them can run autonomously, yet employ different motorization and perception schemes. Lynx M20Pro is based on wheel-legged locomotion with point-cloud mapping and terrain recognition, enabled by dual 96-line LiDAR, dual wide-angle cameras and IMU. Magic Dog Y1 is capable of autonomous navigation, path planning, terrain adaptability and GPS-denied operations, through 3D LiDAR, 2 depth cameras, 2 optical cameras and multi-sensor fusion.

Summary

DEEPRobotics Lynx M20Pro and MagicBot MagicDog Y1 are commercially available industrial quadrupeds with overlapping applications in inspection, security and emergency response. However, the ROBOT24.com market-data records show clear differences in their mobility systems, payload capacities, speed, endurance and autonomous capabilities.

DEEPRobotics Lynx M20Pro vs. MagicBot MagicDog Y1

Introduction

At a Glance

More articles on this topic

BUSINESS NEWS WEEKLY LETTER