Comparisons · Robot24.com Original

OrionStar GreetingBot Mini vs. PadBot X1

GreetingBot Mini combines a 14-inch screen with multilingual interaction and a recorded 55 cm passage requirement. PadBot X1 offers a lighter platform with showroom guidance and video calls. Here’s how they compare.

November 2, 2026 by Business Desk Team

Introduction

Orion Star Greeting Bot Mini and Pad Bot X1 are robot for indoor use designed to interact and guide visitors. They share both a touch screen and autonomous navigation, yet the capabilities listed in each are more relevant to specific reception and showroom applications.

Featuring a 14-inch Full HD touchscreen, language support for over 30 tongues, as well as an escort and following function, Greeting Bot Mini may be helpful for those who are narrow by navigating with a minimum passage width of only 55 cm in our internal tests.

Pad Bot X1 - is a 15 kg, 10.1-inch touch screen, facetracking and video chat with questions and answers that can be configured.its charging time is a key factor to take into consideration when defining operating hours.

This comparison is based on supplied ROBOT24.com market-research data. Runtime, language support and interaction features are reported specifications and are not independently tested.

At a Glance

Metric	OrionStar GreetingBot Mini	PadBot X1
Robot type	Indoor reception and guidance robot	Indoor showroom and guidance robot
Use cases	Reception, visitor information and guided assistance	Showroom guidance, visitor interaction and remote video assistance
Dimensions	Recorded footprint: 410 × 410 mm; height not supplied	350 × 320 × 1,160 mm, width × length × height
Weight	21 kg	15 kg
Display	14-inch Full HD touchscreen	10.1-inch touchscreen
Language support	More than 30 languages recorded	Not specified in the supplied data
Interaction features	Multilingual interaction; escort and following modes	Voice recognition; customizable Q&A; facial recognition
Video calls	Not recorded in the supplied data	Supported
Navigation	LiDAR SLAM; autonomous navigation	Laser-based autonomous indoor navigation
Minimum passage width	55 cm	Not recorded in the supplied data
Runtime	Up to 12 hours	Approximately 10 hours maximum
Charging time	Up to 4.5 hours	Approximately nine hours
Automatic charging	Not specified in the supplied data	Supported
Developer integration	Open APIs recorded	Not specified in the supplied data
Price	US$10,000–13,000	US$2,500–6,000

How They Compare

Size and route clearance

Greeting Bot Mini has a footprint of 410 × 410 mm and weighs 21 kg. Listed for Pad Bot X1 are 350 × 320 × 1,160 mm of length, width, and height, respectively. This means that it is smaller in its base dimensions by the dimensions listed, though it is 6 kilograms lighter.

But; only base size is not enough to provide access through working environment. Greeting Bot Mini has a minimum passage width of 55 cm, and no such equivalent value is provided by Pad Bot X1. Turns are a factor and furniture and visitors on the move.

The provided X1 record has inconsistent dimensions and the manufacturer's 350 × 320 × 1,160 mm takes precedence.

Displays and visitor interaction

Greeting Bot Mini has a bigger touchscreen, 14 inches versus X1's 10.1 inches. Screen size could matter when you are showing directions or information, but it also depends on content design and how far away from the display you are.

Greeting Bot Mini supports over 30 languages. This set of a few example languages at the outset offers a beginning to multilingual reception, but the required languages, local content and speech-quality performance should all be confirmed on-site. Their speech-recognition guarantee is based on a 75 dB state, and not to be assumed as universal.

Pad Bot X1 captures voice recognition, customizable Q&A, and facial recognition data. While these capabilities are related to a showroom-information function, they are not, in and of themselves, indicative of the accuracy of the answers provided or the overall success of a deployment.

Instruction and remote help

Greeting Bot Mini logs escort/following modes and open APIs. These are important for the venue if a guided movement is required or if the venue intends to integrate the robot with other software. The presence of an API does not imply that an integration is ready.

Pad Bot X1 also records video calls, which could prove a documented advantage when linking visitors to remote staff. Those seeking remote support will see this as a helpful difference in the evidence.

Both robots track indoor movement using LIDAR technology. However the specs do not say which system would handle the hectic reception desk better.

Run Time and Charging

Greeting Bot Mini – 12 hours maximum recording/runtime, 4.5 hours maximum charge Pad Bot X1 – 10 hours maximum recording / runtime, nine hours to charge.

The charging time is very long on the X1, so planning charging times becomes critical. Automatic charging is available but the operator still needs to plan for the down time.

Actual operating time will vary based on usage and settings. The listed runtimes are not measured using a standard test. Variable display use, movement, conversations, and video calls.

Recorded pricing

Among the two robots, Pad Bot X1 has the lower price point of US$2,500-6,000 versus US$10,000-13,000 for Greeting Bot Mini.

These ranges do not define comparable buying packages: Software configuration, language content, charge gear, installation and help must all be equal before value may be considered. The figures are meant as recorded prices, not quotations.

Summary

The sensor candidate to examine for multilingual reception and guiding assistance, where having a written record of narrow-passage requirements is essential is Orion Star Greeting Bot Mini. It has a bigger screen, escort and follow modes, and a shorter recorded charging duration in the supplied data.

Pad Bot X1 is a candidate to explore for lightweight showroom guidance and remote video assistance. Its lower recorded price range is a factor and it requires around nine hours to charge.

Select the types of conversations they require, the paths the robot will need to take and if remote staff help is required. The specifications provided define their capabilities but do not define a clear interaction or navigation winner.