The Best Robots for Sweeping Covered Loading Bays 2026

This test compares the PUDU MT1 Max, Gausium Beetle and JTIBOT YZ. The test evaluates the robot's dry sweeping capabilities in floor paved, semi-enclosed logistics environments with the same kind of debris and on the same sweeping route.

We assess every model in five categories: dry debris collection; route coverage; fitting around fixed obstacles; dumping bins and accessing filters; and charging and shift workflow. We do not compare wet scrubbing and rain operation. Our methodology is shown below.

AT A GLANCE

 

The Robots Behind the Rankings

1. PUDU MT1 Max: Stronger assessment for route coverage

Overall score: 86.5/100

Max is a clear winner overall with 86.5/100. It has the highest combined dry debris handling and route coverage scoring and is therefore the best choice in this comparison for normal sweeping work in covered logistics areas.

Rated 9/10 for ability to handle dry debris. Rated 9/10 for route coverage. Rated 8/10 for fit around fixed obstacles and for bin emptying and filter access. Rated 9/10 for charging and shift workflow.

For loading-bay operators, its evaluation indicates a good compromise between debris collection, cleaning coverage and workflow. Its route coverage score may be especially important when servicing larger paved surfaces with the need for multiple cleanings.

The primary concern is that its actual cleaning capability is suitable for the debris profile and route design at the site. Confirm that the offered filtration configuration, bin size and servicing interval are correct before the unit goes into service.

2. Gausium Beetle: Stronger bin and filter servicing assessment

Overall score: 84/100

The second place is awarded to Gausium Beetle, with an overall score of 84/100. The best mark it achieves is 9/10 in bin emptying and filter access.

It also rates 9/10 for dry debris performance, while route coverage, fit around fixed obstacles, charging and shift workflow all rate 8/10.

This makes it a sensible candidate for covered loading bays where regular dust collection and easy servicing are particular operational considerations.

The bin and filter servicing score offers a unique advantage over the competition. For some sites that run cleaning shifts, having bin and filter servicing available may be a factor that impacts maintenance schedules and machine uptime.

The primary difference from the leader is the lower route coverage and charging and shift workflow scores. Buyers should evaluate the actual coverage and operating conditions on the same route prior to final selection.

3. JTIBOT YZ: Consistent assessment across cleaning requirements

Overall score: 80/100

The JTIBOT YZ ranks third with an overall score of 80/100. Its assessment shows consistent results across all five selected parameters, with scores ranging from 8/10 across the board.

Rated 8/10 for dry debris pick-up, route coverage, fit around fixed obstacles, emptying the bin and filter access and for charging and shift flow.

This consistent evaluation is one such candidate for routine dry sweeping in covered logistics environments where a number of operational considerations all need to be taken into account.

With the exception of the third model the JTIBOT YZ does not receive a top of the pack 9/10 rating in any of the individual categories. Its position is therefore entirely consistent with this disparity across the three models.

If a facility is opting for this model, the main thing to check is how much debris will it actually process, how much will be cleaned, and how often will the service be provided under actual operating conditions.

The Best fit depends on the loading bay

The PUDU MT1 Max takes the number one spot in the assessment scoring 86.5/100 with great results for dry debris handling, route coverage, and charging and shift workflow.

Gausium Beetle at 84/100 and with its best result for assessment the bin emptying and filter access JTIBOT YZ at 80/100 and with a balanced performance across the five parameters.

The selection of which equipment to use is ultimately determined by the size and design of the covered loading bay, whether dry debris is collected or wet, and how often the space is cleaned during shifts.

To make a fair comparison, all three robots should be performing on the same grit, dust and light packaging waste on a similar paved route. Bin servicing, filter access and charging needs should also be assessed using similar operating conditions.

Wet scrubbing and operation in the rain are not considered as part of this assessment.

RANKING EXPLAINED

 

Each of the criteria is scored on a 10 point scale and then this is converted into a weighted total out of 100. The models are evaluated on the same shared task with the same parameter weights.

Scoring Summary:

• PUDU MT1 Max: 9 / 9 / 8 / 8 / 9 = 86.5/100
• Gausium Beetle: 9 / 8 / 8 / 9 / 8 = 84/100
• JTIBOT YZ: 8 / 8 / 8 / 8 / 8 = 80/100

Operational comparison is limited to dry sweep of grit/dust/light packaging debris on paved, covered logistics routes. Wet scrubbing and operation in rain are not taken into account.